| New York Times
A NATION CHALLENGED: GROUND ZERO; Burning Diesel Is Cited in Fall Of 3rd
Tower
METROPOLITAN
DESK | March 2, 2002,
Saturday
By JAMES GLANZ AND ERIC LIPTON
Massive structural beams that functioned as a sort of bridge to hold up
the 47-story skyscraper known as 7 World Trade Center were compromised
in a disastrous blaze fed by diesel fuel, leading to the building's
collapse on Sept. 11,
investigators have concluded in a preliminary report.
The tower was set on fire by debris from the twin towers and burned for
about seven hours before
collapsing in the late afternoon under previously unexplained
circumstances. The analysis of its collapse is one of the first
detailed findings by a team of engineers organized by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency and the American Society of Civil Engineers
to understand the fate of all the buildings around the site.
As much as 42,000 gallons of
diesel fuel was stored near ground level in the tower and ran in
pipes up to smaller tanks and emergency generators for
Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani's
command center, the Secret Service's office and other tenants.
Investigators have determined that
the burning fuel apparently
undermined what is known as a transfer truss. The trusses, a series of
steel beams that allowed the skyscraper to be built atop multistory
electricity transformers, were critical to the structural
integrity of the building and
ran near the smaller diesel tanks.
A failure of the same type of
structural bridge contributed to the collapse of the Alfred P. Murrah
Federal Building in Oklahoma City when it was bombed in 1995.
Federal guidelines for public buildings, created in 1996, warned of the
dangers of such trusses in terrorist attacks.
''It's certainly right in the vicinity where the columns go into this
transfer system,'' said a person knowledgeable about the investigators'
draft report on the World Trade Center. ''The rest of the building is
built on top of the bridge.''
While 7 World Trade Center, which stood across Vesey Street just to the
north of the twin towers, was not formally a federal building,
it did house crucial government
offices that included the city's nerve center for emergency response.
The investigators said that their conclusions, combined with other
findings about the failure and collapse of 5 World Trade Center, could
prompt serious changes in the codes used in building construction.
The findings are in a draft
report that has already been circulated among government
agencies, and are based on
videos made on Sept. 11, witnesses' reports, interviews with
firefighters, evidence from the debris pile and structural analysis.
Team members, who described many
of the findings, cautioned that the conclusions on the collapse of 7
World Trade Center could still be modified as reviews proceed.
But Irwin Cantor, one of the building's original structural engineers,
who is now a consulting engineer and member of the City Planning
Commission, said the diesel-related failure of transfer trusses was a
reasonable explanation for the collapse.
He said he believed that diesel tanks were not envisioned in the
original design of the building. ''It ended up with tenants who had
diesels,'' Mr. Cantor said. ''I know none of that was planned at the
beginning.''
According to floor plans submitted to the Port Authority of New York and
New Jersey, which owns the land on which 7 World Trade sat, the building
complied with city fire codes, said Frank Lombardi, the authority's
chief engineer. Those codes permit no more than one fuel tank with a
capacity of 275 gallons or less on above-ground floors, he said.
Jerome M. Hauer, who was the director of Mayor Giuliani's Office of
Emergency Management at the time the command center was opened at 7
World Trade, said several teams of engineers reviewed plans to open the
office there. But no one ever mentioned any hazard associated with
placing fuel tanks above ground, near a transfer truss, he said.
''There were a host of people who looked at this,'' said Mr. Hauer, who
is now a managing director of the crisis and consequence group at Kroll
Worldwide, a security consulting company based in New York. ''We relied
on their judgment.''
Fire officials did at one point
question the storage of large amounts of fuel well above the ground
level, saying that one large tank for the mayor's command center, if
ever compromised, might fuel a fire that would threaten the building.
The Sept. 11 draft report also has photographs and a description of
debris collected from a previously undisclosed,
multistory collapse within 5
World Trade Center, a nine-story office building that also burned on
Sept. 11 but largely remained standing. The team has found that
one specific type of bolted connection, called a column tree connection,
that joined floor-support beams, failed in the heat of the fires,
causing the four-story collapse in the part of 5 World Trade at the
corner of Vesey and Church Streets.
Although no one died as a result of the collapses in 5 and 7 World Trade
Centers, since both stood long enough to be evacuated, the team's
findings are likely to lead to recommended changes in the way public and
government buildings are constructed, much the way similar studies did
after the Northridge earthquake near Los Angeles in 1994 and the
Oklahoma City bombing.
The team is still deliberating on how tightly it can pin down the
precise train of events that led to the collapse of the twin towers
themselves. But until now, the
collapse of 7 World Trade has stood as one of the outstanding mysteries
of the Sept. 11 attack, since before then, no modern, steel-reinforced
high-rise in the United States had ever collapsed in a fire.
High-rise buildings are designed
to be able to survive a fire, even if the fire has to burn itself out.
The strategy is to ensure that the steel support structures are strong
enough or protected well enough from fire that they do not give way in
the time it takes for everything inside an office building, like
furniture, to burn.
In major high-rise fires
elsewhere in the country, such as the 1 Meridian Plaza fire in
Philadelphia in 1991 and the First Interstate Bank fire in Los Angeles
in 1988, this approach has worked. The 1 Meridian fire burned for 19
hours, leaping from floor to floor and burning out as combustible
materials were used up. But the fires at 7 World Trade Center raged
mainly on lower floors and never burned out, and in the chaos of Sept.
11, the Fire Department eventually decided to stop fighting the blazes.
''What the hell would burn so
fiercely for seven hours that the Fire Department would be afraid to
fight it?'' said one member of the investigating team.
According to the Port Authority floor plans, 275-gallon diesel tanks sat
on the fifth, seventh and eighth floors and were fed through pipes from
the larger tanks near ground level.
The team member said that while
the diesel fuel remains the most likely candidate for feeding the fires,
it was still unknown whether there could have been other sources of fuel
in the building, kept there by tenants like the Secret Service
that have disclosed little of what their spaces contained.
The huge steel transfer trusses
ran mostly through the fifth, sixth and seventh floors where the fires
burned. The purpose of
the trusses, which included zigzagging and horizontal members and were
concentrated around the building's core, was to allow 7 World Trade to
be built over two Consolidated Edison substations that already
existed on that spot when the building went up in the late 1980's.
Together the stations held 10 transformers, each about 35 feet high and
40 feet wide.
Using the trusses to avoid having vertical structural columns pierce the
transformers, the building was constructed around them like a hen
sitting on a giant egg.
''We had to do design tricks to accommodate the existing Con Ed
facility,'' said Mr. Cantor, the structural engineer. ''This building
had an awful lot of transfers.''
Transfer trusses are a well-tested technique and are used in countless
high-rise buildings, as well as in bridges around the world. Engineers
say that transfer trusses, for most buildings, present no extraordinary
hazard. But if there is an explosion, earthquake or long-burning fire,
they can present a problem.
In Oklahoma City, during the
1995 bombing of the Federal Building, a large transfer girder on the
building's third floor gave way, helping to precipitate a progressive
collapse that later analysis showed was responsible for most of
the 168 deaths. After this attack, federal guidelines for buildings that
would hold government agencies were changed, recommending that buildings
be designed so that single-point failures did not cause a catastrophic
collapse.
Videos of the 5:28 p.m. collapse of 7 World Trade lend vivid support to
the truss-failure theory.
Roughly 30 seconds before the building goes down, a rooftop mechanical
room starts to disappear, falling into the building's core.
Then a second larger rooftop
room sinks. The building then quickly collapses.
Both rooms were above sections of the building held up by the trusses.
Other video evidence shows fire
concentrated in the floors containing the trusses and the fuel tanks.
Dr. John D. Osteraas, director of civil engineering practice, Exponent
Failure Analysis Associates, in Menlo Park, Calif., reviewed videos of
the collapse, discussed it with other engineers and came to a similar
conclusion; the fuel, the trusses and the fire brought 7 World Trade
down. ''The pieces have come together,'' he said. ''Without the fuel, I
think the building would have done fine.'' |